Wednesday, 8 June 2016

How it feels to live with the possibility of “sudden death”

Writer Eva Hagberg Fisher spent years living with the possibility that she could die at any moment – but no-one could tell her for sure, because her doctors struggled to diagnose her illness. Rose Eveleth asked her what it was like, and explores how contemplating death can change our thinking.
Today, Eva Hagberg Fisher is a PhD student, architecture critic and writer based in Berkeley. She just sold her second book, a memoir about friendship. And for the last eight years, Hagberg Fisher has lived with the idea that her death could come at any moment.
In 2008, Hagberg Fisher was living in New York City, and slowly started to feel a little weird. She was dizzy a lot of the time, and thirsty almost always. One day in January she woke up and walked into her kitchen, where she felt “like the floor was rising up to meet me, or like I was heading down to meet the floor”, she wrote in an e-book about her medical struggles. “Like there was a rolling wave that began on the floor and then rose up through my body, bringing with it the acidic taste of boiled metal, the treble sound of high violin strings.” A doctor at NYU sent her for an MRI. Perhaps it was a small tumour, wrapping around her ear, throwing off her balance. She went to rehab, undergoing vestibular therapy twice a week. It didn’t do much.

She thought perhaps it was the stress of living in such an exhausting city, so in 2009 she moved to Portland to relax. “I basically rode my bike and ate a lot of Oreos and kind of had this palette-cleansing year,” she told me. While in Portland, she applied for graduate school and in 2010 moved to Berkeley to start a PhD program in architectural history.
But early into her PhD and her time in Berkeley, she noticed more unusual symptoms. The dizziness was back. She was anxious all the time. She found herself consumed with obsessive thoughts. A doctor in San Francisco prescribed her an anti-anxiety medication. Anxiety was common among graduate students, they said, it was likely responsible for her dizziness too. The medication numbed her but it didn’t really stop the problems. “It made my symptoms kind of easier to accept, but it didn’t make them go away.” Slowly, everything started getting harder and harder to do. She woke up sweating, and struggled to focus on anything. She had sudden mood swings and tantrums, throwing glasses around her kitchen and forgetting her students’ names. “Things just stopped making sense physically and they also stopped making sense mentally,” she says.
And then she fainted. In the hallway of her yoga studio, mid-conversation, she blacked out and fell to the floor. At the student health services centre, a doctor gave her an EKG, and diagnosed her with something called Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, a heart condition in which the electrical signaling in the heart malfunctions. One of the risks of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, the doctors told her, is “sudden death”. The next day Hagberg Fisher woke up and couldn’t walk. “Nothing made sense, I was really confused.”
At the emergency room, where the doctors were convinced she was simply dehydrated, a nurse lobbied to have her admitted. She spent the next six days in the hospital, while doctors struggled to figure out what was causing her array of symptoms. They ruled out diabetes, syphilis, AIDS, liver cancer, and Lyme disease. They un-diagnosed her with Wolff-Parkinson-White. One resident thought it was depression. Another thought it might be an aggressive tumour. Oddly, the idea of a tumour that would kill her quickly was almost a relief. “I had been thinking that I just need to try harder and breathe better and get better at doing yoga and all of a sudden they’re talking about a carcinoid tumour, words that I had never heard before, and my first thought was validation, because I had been trying to get better on my own and I couldn’t.”
Eventually she convinced the doctors to do an MRI to look at her brain. A few hours later, they came back with the first solid result she would get: a lesion in her brain that had hemorrhaged behind her pituitary gland. But this was only the beginning of years of medical confusion, diagnoses and un-diagnoses, and a continuous life on the brink of death.  
Over the course of the next five years, Hagberg Fisher’s medical story started looking like an episode of the drama House. Doctors thought she had ovarian cancer, a brain tumour, overian cancer again, chronic fatigue syndrome, mould illness and more. Some of those suspicions turned into diagnoses, and some of those diagnoses were then reversed. She had surgery for something suspicious in her ovaries, but it turned out to be nothing. She was moments from death in an ambulance driving across the Golden Gate Bridge when her sodium levels dipped two points away from brain stem death. “I remember looking out the back windows and crossing over the bridge and thinking ‘this is going to be the last thing I’m ever going to see,’ and I was calm. That calm that people talk about, I felt it. At the time I thought I was really calm because I was tough, but now I know it was that my brain was shutting down.” She was re-diagnosed with Wolff-Parkinson-White and had heart surgery to treat it. She moved to Arizona to escape what she thought were allergies. It didn’t work. She got married, and moved back to California and a doctor who she describes as her “Doctor House” diagnosed her with mast cell activation syndrome, an immune disorder where certain cells release too many chemicals.

Today, for the first time in years, Hagberg Fisher is living without a diagnosis hanging over her. She’s on a strict plan to keep her mast cell activation in check and she says it’s working, and she feels better. But she still lives with uncertainty about her health. She’s never sure when she might be diagnosed again with a tumour, whether there’s something lurking within her waiting to finally reveal itself. But she says the uncertainty of her own life, and how long it might last, has completely changed her.
Scientists know that reflecting on death can influence our thinking in profound ways, often without us realising. Some research has shown that whenever any resource, like time left to live, is scarce, people tend to value it more. Another researcher has found that when students write about death for a period of time, they report lower rates of depression and anxiety and higher levels of self-esteem and motivation.
Studies show that imagining your own demise can even change your biases and politics. There’s a concept in psychology called Terror Management Theory that suggests that when humans are subconsciously presented with the concept of their own deaths, they become less tolerant and more aggressive. One of the classic studies in this theory involves judges presented with a court case in which they have to set a bond for the defendant. Judges who were subconsciously reminded of their own death before the fake trial set an average bond of $50. Those who were reminded of their mortality set an average bond of $455.
All of this raises an intriguing possibility: if in the future, medicine allows us to know the date of our death with greater clarity (see sidebar: “The day you will die”), then it could change us in more ways than we realise.

Still, it’s one thing to think about death in the abstract, distant sense, and another to be faced with the possibility of your own happening suddenly today. Hagberg Fisher likens it to when a close friend or family member dies. You might know they are going to die soon, you might try to prepare for it, but when the news hits, there’s a kind of grief that you can’t really get ready for. You can’t understand what it’s like until it happens.
For Hagberg Fisher, the possibility of death hung over her for nearly a decade. No-one could tell her what the prognosis was or what was making her sick. Often they wouldn’t even say the words “cancer” or “tumour.” When she was re-diagnosed with Wolff-Parkinson-White, the risk of sudden death consumed her. She found herself frozen in yoga poses, afraid to move, lest she bring upon her own death.
There are plenty of famous quotes about living like it’s your last day. Steve Jobs once said: “I have looked in the mirror every morning and asked myself: "If today were the last day of my life, would I want to do what I am about to do today?" And whenever the answer has been "No" for too many days in a row, I know I need to change something.” These quotes might seem cheesy, but Hagberg Fisher says that living in death’s shadow for so long truly has changed her outlook on life. She is adamant about living in the moment. She rarely makes plans beyond a few weeks out.
And when she’s laughing, she says she makes sure to take a note of it. “Every time I find myself hysterically laughing I call attention to it, I am experiencing laughter and joy and this is beautiful and I am going to soak it up because I know so well its opposite. The lows and lower and the highs are higher, and the highs are really beautiful.”


The article talks about a girl by the name Hagberg Fisher who was suffering unknown symptoms and living in fear of death for over a decade. The author of the article seemed biased against the doctors and towards the protagonist in the article, seeing as they touched on how much the doctors couldn’t grasp the symptoms and by mentioning that regardless of the numerous prescriptions and surgeries, Hagsberg didn’t seem to be getting better. I think that the American government should contribute to the education of students especially in the field of medication so that it can protect more of its citizens and reduce more deaths than it is already. I also think that the article teaches us a good lesson about life. It’s easy to forget how much of a gift living a healthy life is, but I think through this article I was able to reflect and be more thankful for such blessings.

“How it feels to live with the possibility of “sudden death””. June 7, 2016. BBC. June 7, 2016. < http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20160607-how-it-feels-to-live-with-the-possibility-of-sudden-death>

15 comments:

  1. This is a very interesting article. I agree with your analysis. It is important to remember that we won't live forever and should appreciate the days we are granted. I can see the bias towards Hagberg Fisher. It is very strange that for ten years no doctor's have been able to find what is wrong with her. Great article and great response!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's easy to sympathize with anyone who has suffered so terribly and for so long, but I don't see too much of a bias against medical professionals in this article--it acknowledges that her case was a very difficult one, and the story of one person definitely does not reflect on the state of medicine in the country as a whole.

    Death is sometimes a difficult reality for humans to process--sometimes people die without every coming to terms with it at all. The article encourages us to examine our own mortalities.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Death is a struggle for everyone no matter how strong you are. I agree that doctors are the ones with our lives on their hands and should be supported by the government. However, in these extreme cases when neither the doctors nor the medical students know nothing about the disease. I think this is what we call an unfortunate situation not fault of the doctors.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Though-provoking article. Hagberg Fisher's story is sad but many people have stories like this. I wouldn't put the blame on the doctors since they did what they could and sometimes it just happens that they can't find a cure. America has a great educational system in general, so I don't think the government can do anything about it. I agree with you that Hagperg's story makes one appreciate life more. I didn't see clear bias from the author

    ReplyDelete
  5. Contrary to your analysis I don't see much of a bias against the doctors. The patient admits that her disease is the first of its kind and cannot be treated. I found the idea that knowing the time of our deaths more precisely could change the way we think interesting. Throughout our whole life our death seems so distant and yet it could virtually happen any moment. Perhaps it could help us filter out what is truly important and what isn't, or it could end up simply causing anxiety. Only the future will tell.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Interesting article:) I would say though that the bias isn't really against the doctors. It seemed to be more of a information type of an article for someone's life. I do agree with you though that the article does make me think about how much of a blessing it is to have a healthy life. The article touches on the fear that people could have from a possibility of a "sudden death" due to an unknown disease that the current technology or information can figure out. I also think that what the government can do is to make it easier for further research but it isn't really anyone's fault that they can't diagnose the disease. It's more of a current technology thing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. As many have pointed out in previous comments, there is not bias against the doctors, as you stated in your response. Hagberg Fisher, realizes that her disease is unknown, so although frustrated, she is still thankful that someone is trying to help. This is an opportunity for doctors to research something new, and discover a new disease and treatment for it. This article is really explaining the fact, that life is short and full of difficulties. Hagberg Fisher is only an example that the article uses to support their point that life has problems. Interesting article.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This was a very interesting article. I agree with your response, it does help open your eyes to the things that truly matter in this world. I agree with what others have said, there isn't much bias against the doctors but this was still a great response and a very interesting article choice.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This article brings a new perspective to a situation that I wouldn't have thought about previosulsy, being that the idea of death is not so inconceivable as it may seem in everyday life. The woman in the article mentioned that when she was on the brink of death that she had expereiecned a calm that she thought was because she was about to die. However, she realized later that it was only because her brain was shutting down. I've heard that you can never really prepare for death whether it being your own or someone else's, but it seems that the body, on the brink of death preapres. So this shows that if we were to know the time of death, it might not change so much as what we would do, but it would change our persepective on life. In referenece to your reseponse, I don't think the US governemnt has as much power to influence schools to promote the education of medicine, and I think that is more dependent on the schools themselves. I'm not even sure ifits necessary because there are already many students pouring their lives into medicine. Although, I think that the US government can promote awareness of different sicknesse and the value of life. Great thought provoking article!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I would agree with everyone else that the bias isn't against the doctors. It seems like the article touches on the impossible factor of this illness and the new opportunities created for further research. But the interviews and the details about the patient help us easily relate to the issues of the disease I wouldn't blame anyone. Along with this, when looking at the article, it talks about the point of life and how death enhances our motivation and our actions. I would agree with this point and it seems as though in the future science might be advanced enough to be able to estimate our death dates which would be really interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Your article was really interesting and I thought that it was nice to have a fresh topic. I don't really see a bias against the doctors but the article does point out the fact that we live in an imperfect world where doctors can't solve everything. Overall, Great Article!

    ReplyDelete
  12. This is indeed an interesting article choice and an interesting response. In my opinion, the US government does indeed spend an extremely large amount of money every year on medical aid, and I do believe that the doctors care about their patients, contrary to what the author of the article seemed to believe. I'm guessing that this particular case was very stressful for the doctors and they were doing everything within the realm of possibility to cure her and figure out what exactly was wrong. But other than that, I agree with the rest of your response and what information the article presented.

    ReplyDelete
  13. you're article was super interesting and it shows us how we need live life everyday. this doesnt involve any current issue though and something that has conflict. But it is very biased toward the doctors, seeing that the author makes it clear that the doctors had no idea what they were doing when they diagnosed her.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This article voices Hagberg Fisher's unfortunate story. The article also reminds the audience that the gift of life is extremely precious and fleeting. However, I did not detect bias against the doctors in this article. Instead the author was simply writing with the objective to tell Fisher's story. Although, I see where you are coming from because the article heavily highlights that doctors can't fix everything contrary to popular belief. Good Job!

    ReplyDelete
  15. The situation that is described in this article is an extremely unfortunate one, but it also seems to be such a rare case that even if the government did establish all of the safety procedures that have already been addressed in previous responses, it would not have made much of an impact. I definately agree that it would be beneficial to the nation as a whole to better the education of future generations concerning health. It would also be intersting to read more about the phsycological impact that living with this condition had on Hagberg Fisher.

    ReplyDelete